Author: Chris Warren

  • Suze Orman Prepaid Card Discontinued June 30

    Suze Orman Prepaid Card Discontinued June 30

    Celebrity financial advisor, Suze Orman, has urged countless people seeking her money guidance to get a grip and not make a purchase when they could not afford it. It’s the kind of tough love advice that makes for good entertainment, but it’s also not what holders of the Suze Orman prepaid card are being advised to do right now. Instead, customers in possession of the Suze Orman prepaid card are being told to spend, spend, spend.That’s because Orman’s Approved Card, a partnership with Bancorp Bank that was released in early 2012, is suspending operations on July 1. According to a story in The New York Times, holders of the Approved Card recently received a letter from Bancorp Bank urging them to spend whatever money remained in their accounts – anything not spent would be refunded to them.

    The disappearance of the Suze Orman prepaid card, which she reportedly launched with $1 million of her own money, is not an isolated case in the once bustling celebrity prepaid card market. Basketball superstar Magic Johnson’s prepaid card will also suspend operations on June 30. Prepaid debit cards backed by the Kardashian sisters, singer Justin Bieber and comedian George Lopez have either been discontinued or are no longer prominently marketing their celebrity backing.

    The suspension of Orman’s Approved Card is especially illustrative in understanding why the stampede of celebrity prepaid cards seems to be at an end. Unlike the cards offered by the Kardashians – which charged a whopping $100 to just buy the card, along with a host of other big fees – Orman’s Approved Card charged relatively modest fees, including a $3 account maintenance charge. But even with a more consumer-friendly offering, the economics of Orman’s card clearly didn’t pencil out. “You’re dealing with a lot of customers who have a lot of things go wrong, and they need their money to put milk and bread on the table,” industry consultant Rob Rosenblatt told The New York Times. “Three dollars is a really tough baseline from which to serve customers who are going to be calling a lot.”

    Another factor driving celebrity prepaid cards out of the market is competition. Large financial services companies like American Express have unveiled ultra low-fee products like Bluebird and Serve. Bluebird, for instance, charges no activation fee and has no monthly account maintenance charge. Fans of Suze Orman, Justin Bieber and Magic Johnson would have to be unusually devoted to pay unnecessary fees.

  • Consumer Financial Protection Report: Mishandling Credit Report Errors, Hassling Consumers and More

    Consumer Financial Protection Report: Mishandling Credit Report Errors, Hassling Consumers and More

    Harassing phone calls. Credit report errors. Payday loan company employees showing up at a customer’s workplace demanding money. These are just some of the more troubling findings in a recent report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was set up in the wake of the financial meltdown to police financial products and services.

    The latest Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report highlights the agency’s regulatory supervisory activities between November 2013 and February 2014. According to the CFPB, which has a nationwide network of examiners whose job it is to review how well financial services companies are complying with the law, credit bureaus are not always properly handling credit report errors. This is important for a consumer’s financial protection because mistakes about how someone repays their debts can hurt their chances for qualifying for a mortgage or car loan or even nix their chances of landing a job.

    Although the CFPB didn’t name the credit bureaus in its report, it did note that at least one had not been properly processing documentation provided by consumers seeking to dispute an error on their credit report. The law allows consumers to provide documentation to correct credit report errors, information that the credit bureaus are supposed to forward along to creditors so that a dispute can be resolved. Because this was not happening, the CFPB issued a warning to the non-compliant credit bureaus.

    The CFPB also found some debt collectors egregiously violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The FDCPA is an attempt to rein in abusive practices and harassment by companies seeking to recoup money loaned to consumers. Yet the agency found that constraints imposed by the FDCPA were routinely ignored. For instance, one unnamed company made around 17,000 phone calls to consumers outside hours allowed by the FDCPA. “In addition, the entity also violated the FDCPA when it repeatedly contacted more than one thousand customers, contacting some consumers as often as 20 times within two days,” says the report.

    Additionally, the FDCPA does not permit debt collectors to make false or misleading statements in their efforts to collect money they’re owed. Investigators from the CFPB discovered one company was routinely filing lawsuits riddled with factual inaccuracies about how much a consumer owed. “When the consumer filed an answer, the entity would dismiss the suit because it was unable to locate documentation to support its claims,” says the report.

    The CFPB also cited one payday loan company for sending employees to the workplace of consumers in order to collect debts. This was occurring despite the fact that consumers had specifically requested that it stop and the practice being in violation of the Dodd-Frank Act.

     

  • Visa Attacks Prepaid Fee Confusion

    Visa Attacks Prepaid Fee Confusion

    It’s getting harder and harder for prepaid card issuers to be sneaky about their fees. Earlier this year the Pew Charitable Trusts issued a report detailing the lack of uniformity when it comes to prepaid fee disclosures and proposed a model disclosure box to make it easy for consumers to compare the fees associated with different products. Soon after that announcement, Chase declared that its Chase Liquid Prepaid Card would adopt Pew’s disclosure suggestions.

    On June 3rd, Visa decided to weigh in on the prepaid fee disclosure issue. Working in conjunction with Pew and the Center for Financial Services Innovation, Visa announced that it has developed an easily understandable designation for consumers to look for in order to know quickly whether a prepaid card meets certain standards related to fees, disclosure and benefits. Prepaid card issuers that qualify can include a seal on their packaging and marketing materials that indicate their compliance with certain criteria. Think of it as a prepaid version of the “fair trade” sticker that graces coffee packaging.

    “We felt it was important to go beyond current requirements in the marketplace and bring transparency to this growing product area,” says Ryan McInerney, president of Visa Inc. “This Visa designation will signify a new level of simplicity, protection and opportunity, enabling cardholders to confidently manage their spending every day.”

    In order to qualify for the Visa designation, prepaid cards must meet a variety of standards such as offering a flat monthly fee that includes all day-to-day uses for the card. In other words, there are a lot of things that prepaid card issuers can’t charge for, such as point of service (POS) cash back, in-network ATM transactions, PIN or signature transaction fees and customer service or overdraft fees.

    Additionally, qualifying cards must also offer specific consumer protections. Among other things, to receive a seal of approval cards have to include FDIC insurance, dispute resolution rights and Visa’s zero liability coverage.

    According to Pew’s Susan Weinstock, who directs the group’s consumer banking initiatives, Visa’s move is important. “Visa is taking an important step forward by acknowledging the importance of clear disclosures and consumer protections,” she says. “It’s particularly encouraging that Visa is not allowing overdrafts on these cards, in light of our research on consumer prepaid card use.”

  • Accenture survey: Banks Face Big Threat

    Accenture survey: Banks Face Big Threat

    North American banks that don’t clue in that their competitors now include companies like PayPal, T-Mobile and even the US Postal Service could be facing big trouble. That’s the conclusion of a recent survey and analysis by the consulting companies Accenture titled, “The Digital Disruption in Banking: Demons, Demands, and Dividends.”

    The Accenture survey, which was based on feedback from around 4,000 retail banking customers in the US and Canada, found that evolving technologies and changing consumer attitudes pose real dilemmas to traditional banks. Accenture found that although almost 40 percent of US customers have been with their current bank for a decade or more, a host of factors shows that now is not the time for banks to assume their customers aren’t looking for better options.

    For instance, over one quarter of those surveyed by Accenture said they would consider a branchless digital bank if they opted to leave their current bank. Not surprisingly, the number of younger people who see no reason to visit a branch is high, with 39 percent of those between the ages of 18 and 34 saying they would consider all digital banking.

    Perhaps even more worrying for traditional banks is the fact that almost three-quarters of US customers said they consider their relationship, such as it is, with their bank to be “transactional.” In other words, the bond between customers and banks is paper-thin, which makes two of Accenture’s other findings hardly surprising. More than half of the customers asked said they want their bank to proactively suggest products and services that can help them meet their unique financial needs. Half would also be interested in an analysis of their spending that was future focused and available in real time.

    The Accenture survey also asked bank customers what companies they would consider as financial service providers. This is not merely an abstract question either, given that T-Mobile has launched a prepaid debit card and digital wallet and Walmart now has a partnership with American Express in which it sells the AmEx Serve prepaid card and the Bluebird checking account alternative. Topping the list of companies respondents would consider banking with – not all of them actually offer financial services – are Square, PayPal, T-Mobile, Costco, Apple and Google.

    Being a consulting company, Accenture is also in the business of providing solutions to the problems big companies face. Their answer to the threat faced by big banks has three parts. It includes making the customer experience seamless, regardless of whether someone is making a transaction in a branch or digitally. The second part involves extending a bank’s so-called “ecosystem” by offering more services to customers. And finally, Accenture suggests banks offer personalized digital solutions to customers’ financial needs. None of these steps are easy, but responding to changes in how customers bank seems to be a challenge that won’t go away anytime soon.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Consumer Advocates: Credit CARD Act Saves $12.6 Billion Annually

    Consumer Advocates: Credit CARD Act Saves $12.6 Billion Annually

    On the fifth anniversary of the passage of the federal Credit CARD Act of 2009, a group of consumer advocates praised its effectiveness in saving Americans $12.6 billion per year and urged similar legislation for debit and prepaid cards. Groups ranging from Americans for Financial Reform to Consumer Action to the National Consumer Law Center argue that the controversial legislation has helped eliminate many consumer-unfriendly fees and practices.

    “The CARD Act has been hugely successful in banning the biggest unfair credit card gotchas like retroactive interest rate hikes and excessive penalty fees,” says Linda Sherry, Director of National Priorities at Consumer Action. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has calculated that the law saves consumers $4 billion per year in fees alone, while another estimate puts the total savings from banned interest charges and fees closer to $13 billion each year.

    While Sherry says that more action is needed to bolster credit card protections, like limits on fees and other credit safeguards, she and the other advocates used the anniversary to urge legislation to address problems with debit and prepaid cards. In particular, the groups take aim at overdraft fees, which the Center for Responsible Lending costs consumers nearly $6 billion per year. “Overdraft fees should be completely banned on debit and prepaid card transactions,” says Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center. Rather than overdraft fees, Saunders says that transactions can be denied and consumers should have the option of skipping the purchase or paying with credit. “Keeping overdraft fees off of prepaid cards is especially important to keep those cards safe for people who have been shut out of bank accounts.”

    The consumer advocates urge lawmakers to pay special attention to prepaid cards, which they say have no consumer protections under federal law or regulations. The CFPB is currently considering new rules to protect debit and prepaid card users. Earlier this year Virginia Senator Mark Warner introduced legislation that would require prepaid card issuers fully disclose fees associated with these products.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
Prepaid Debit Card Reviews, Complaints, Etc