False Labeling: Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, Backcountry.com, and J.C. Penny to Pay Penalties Totaling $1.3 Million for Mislabeling Rayon Textiles as Made of “Bamboo”

The Federal Trade Commission announced complaints and proposed court orders barring four national retailers from mislabeling and advertising rayon textiles as made of “bamboo,” and requiring them to pay civil penalties totaling $ 1.3 million.

Under the court orders settling the FTC’s charges, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. will pay $ 500,000; Nordstrom, Inc. will pay $ 360,000; J.C. Penney Company, Inc. will pay $ 290,000; and Backcountry.com LLC will pay $ 150,000 for allegedly violating the FTC Act and the agency’s Textile Rules.

“It’s misleading to call bamboo that has been chemically processed into rayon simply ‘bamboo,’” said Jessica Rich, Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. “With consumers in the midst of their holiday shopping, it’s important for them to know that textiles marketed as environmentally friendly alternatives may not be as ‘green’ as they were led to believe.”

The complaints announced today allege the four companies broke the law by continuing to misrepresent or mislabel rayon products as “bamboo” despite receiving warning letters from the FTC in 2010 and a synopsis of previous litigated cases against marketers for deceptively labeling rayon products as bamboo. The Commission charged the companies with violating the Textile Act and the Textile Rules and with violating Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act by falsely and deceptively selling the mislabeled products, despite knowing that doing so was illegal and could subject them to civil penalties.

Specifically, Bed Bath & Beyond’s mislabeled items, also sold through its subsidiary buybuy BABY, included dozens of “bamboo” textiles, including “Aden + Anais Bamboo 3-Pack Muslin Swaddles” and “Bamboo Blend Napkins.”

Nordstrom sold similar products online and in its stores, including a “Gypsy 05 Bamboo Racerback Hi-Lo Dress” and “Degree Six Clothing The Bamboo Long Sleeve Tee.”

J.C. Penney sold numerous “bamboo” products in its stores and online, including “Muk Luks 4-pk Men’s Bamboo Socks.” It also falsely claimed “bamboo” gave the products antimicrobial properties.

Similarly, Backcountry.com sold “bamboo” textiles, such as “Bridgedale Bamboo Crew Sock – Men’s.”  Backcountry also made anti-microbial claims for its “bamboo” products.

The proposed orders settling the FTC’s charges are identical, aside from the civil penalty amounts. They prohibit the companies from violating the FTC’s Textile Act and Rules by failing to properly identify the fiber content when labeling and advertising any textiles containing manufactured fibers.

Business and Consumer Information

“Avoid Bamboo-zling Your Buyers,” provides useful information on how to correctly label and advertise textiles that are rayon made from bamboo and cautions sellers that it is highly unlikely they are selling actual bamboo fiber products. The FTC also has an educational publication for consumers called “Bamboo Fabrics.

The Commission votes approving the complaints and proposed civil penalty orders, and authorizing the staff to refer them to the Department of Justice for filing, were each 4-0. The DOJ filed the complaints and proposed orders in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on December 9, 2015.

The FTC also announced today it is sending letters to other retailers to help protect consumers from deceptive “bamboo” claims – especially during this busy shopping season – by imploring retailers to check their own inventories and ensure proper labeling and advertising of rayon textile products.

NOTE:  The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. Civil penalty orders have the force of law when signed by the District Court judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

This article by the FTC was distributed by the Personal Finance Syndication Network.


Personal Finance Syndication Network

Author: Shane Tripcony

  • False Labeling: Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, Backcountry.com, and J.C. Penny to Pay Penalties Totaling $1.3 Million for Mislabeling Rayon Textiles as Made of “Bamboo”

    False Labeling: Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, Backcountry.com, and J.C. Penny to Pay Penalties Totaling $1.3 Million for Mislabeling Rayon Textiles as Made of “Bamboo”

    The Federal Trade Commission announced complaints and proposed court orders barring four national retailers from mislabeling and advertising rayon textiles as made of “bamboo,” and requiring them to pay civil penalties totaling $ 1.3 million.

    Under the court orders settling the FTC’s charges, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. will pay $ 500,000; Nordstrom, Inc. will pay $ 360,000; J.C. Penney Company, Inc. will pay $ 290,000; and Backcountry.com LLC will pay $ 150,000 for allegedly violating the FTC Act and the agency’s Textile Rules.

    “It’s misleading to call bamboo that has been chemically processed into rayon simply ‘bamboo,’” said Jessica Rich, Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. “With consumers in the midst of their holiday shopping, it’s important for them to know that textiles marketed as environmentally friendly alternatives may not be as ‘green’ as they were led to believe.”

    The complaints announced today allege the four companies broke the law by continuing to misrepresent or mislabel rayon products as “bamboo” despite receiving warning letters from the FTC in 2010 and a synopsis of previous litigated cases against marketers for deceptively labeling rayon products as bamboo. The Commission charged the companies with violating the Textile Act and the Textile Rules and with violating Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act by falsely and deceptively selling the mislabeled products, despite knowing that doing so was illegal and could subject them to civil penalties.

    Specifically, Bed Bath & Beyond’s mislabeled items, also sold through its subsidiary buybuy BABY, included dozens of “bamboo” textiles, including “Aden + Anais Bamboo 3-Pack Muslin Swaddles” and “Bamboo Blend Napkins.”

    Nordstrom sold similar products online and in its stores, including a “Gypsy 05 Bamboo Racerback Hi-Lo Dress” and “Degree Six Clothing The Bamboo Long Sleeve Tee.”

    J.C. Penney sold numerous “bamboo” products in its stores and online, including “Muk Luks 4-pk Men’s Bamboo Socks.” It also falsely claimed “bamboo” gave the products antimicrobial properties.

    Similarly, Backcountry.com sold “bamboo” textiles, such as “Bridgedale Bamboo Crew Sock – Men’s.”  Backcountry also made anti-microbial claims for its “bamboo” products.

    The proposed orders settling the FTC’s charges are identical, aside from the civil penalty amounts. They prohibit the companies from violating the FTC’s Textile Act and Rules by failing to properly identify the fiber content when labeling and advertising any textiles containing manufactured fibers.

    Business and Consumer Information

    “Avoid Bamboo-zling Your Buyers,” provides useful information on how to correctly label and advertise textiles that are rayon made from bamboo and cautions sellers that it is highly unlikely they are selling actual bamboo fiber products. The FTC also has an educational publication for consumers called “Bamboo Fabrics.

    The Commission votes approving the complaints and proposed civil penalty orders, and authorizing the staff to refer them to the Department of Justice for filing, were each 4-0. The DOJ filed the complaints and proposed orders in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on December 9, 2015.

    The FTC also announced today it is sending letters to other retailers to help protect consumers from deceptive “bamboo” claims – especially during this busy shopping season – by imploring retailers to check their own inventories and ensure proper labeling and advertising of rayon textile products.

    NOTE:  The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. Civil penalty orders have the force of law when signed by the District Court judge.

    The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

    This article by the FTC was distributed by the Personal Finance Syndication Network.


    Personal Finance Syndication Network

  • Student Debt Remains Part of Economic Instability

    Student Debt Remains Part of Economic Instability

    After four years of university study and several more for a second or third degree, students are left with tremendous debt and a big hole in their pockets. Despite attempts to stay within a budget, find secure employment and start a payback plan, graduates find themselves stuck in the mire of financial obligations and bank loans.

    Not all graduates face the same fate and the type of degree can determine the ease of finding proper employment as well as the salary associated with it. For example, many educators today view a humanities degree as practically useless when it comes to procuring a job with any semblance of sufficient income and specialty degrees such as those in the medical, dental or engineering fields require extra years of study and hence additional loans.

    According to an article published in The Atlantic in March 2014, even those who continue on with their studies and obtain humanities Ph.D.s have job prospects no better than those who end their studies earlier. In the Atlantic article, English professor William Pannapacker suggested that a humanities Ph.D. “will place you at a disadvantage competing against 22-year-olds for entry-level jobs that barely require a high-school diploma.” Pannapacker went on to advise would-be graduate students to recognize that a humanities Ph.D is now a worthless degree and they should avoid going into further debt in order to acquire one.

    Andrew Green, associate director at the Career Center at the University of California, Berkeley has a different take on the situation. He admits that there is no doubt that humanities doctorates have struggled with their employment prospects, but he points to less widely known data showing that between a fifth and a quarter of these doctorates go on to work in well-paying jobs in media, corporate America, non-profits, and government.

    Paula Chambers, founder of Versatile Ph.D., a service that prepares graduate students for the non-academic job market, takes a positive view of the employment situation for humanities graduates. Chambers points to humanities Ph.D.s in many industries far removed from academia such as a Ph.D. in Greek and Roman history who landed a marketing job at a wine estate, a Ph.D. in British history who is now a branch chief at the National Parks Service or a Ph.D. in Classics exerting influence as a director at a hedge fund.

    But were these the goals set by humanity students when they started their graduate education? How long will it take them to repay the loans they incurred in order to reach the academic level they did?

    When it comes to graduates in other disciplines, the numbers aren’t much better. According to a research study conducted by UK specialist insurer, Endsleigh and reported in England’s Guardian in August 2014, only 34% of the then recent graduates had found full-time work in the career of their choice.

    The vast majority of graduates do, eventually, find work, but often it is in a different field to their degree. According to Higher Education Statistical Agency figures for 2012-2013, only 8% of the students surveyed were unemployed six months after leaving university. But how much were they earning? The Endsleigh survey found that almost half (48%) of them said their current wage was lower than expected, with 57% currently earning £15,999 or less with the average salary around £20,000. Certainly not enough to pay back all the debts accrued over the years of study.

    One of the solutions to the debt-study dilemma that has proven successful but which may not be appropriate for everyone is to work while attending school. Both small and large corporations are eager to employ students who will agree to a lower salary while attending classes towards their degree. On some levels it is a win-win situation. The student gains work experience and has some income towards his/her studies while the hiring firm pays less for a worker who, at the end the tenure, may well prove appropriate to the position and be taken on as a permanent member of the staff without the need of retraining for the job.

    In the above situation, although there no guarantee of employment upon completion of the student’s degree, at least an accumulated debt of untold proportions has been avoided.
    The most obvious direction to choose for avoiding education loans is simply to postpone studies altogether until the money is there. But this is a catch-22. No education, no job. No job, no money. What is a student to do?

    The problem of student debt is growing. Here are the statistics according to a report posted on CNBC in June, 2015, and the numbers are staggering: There is more than $ 1.2 trillion in outstanding student loan debt, 40 million borrowers and an average balance of $ 29,000. The high levels are serving to perpetuate or even worsen economic inequality and are undercutting the opportunity and social mobility that higher education should provide.

    Perhaps one way to avoid the debt altogether would be for students to plan to put away a small amount of money on a steady basis as soon as they are able and to learn how to invest their money early on in their lives. Opening an investment account with a good broker can be done at any age with the approval of an adult and as an individual from the age of 18. Investing can also be fun but learning to do it properly requires at least the minimum of training and education.

    With today’s precarious global financial situation accelerating, it appears that the question of student debt and its repercussions remains a large part of the economic equation.

    This article by Cina Coren first appeared on DailyForex.com and was distributed by the Personal Finance Syndication Network.

    Personal Finance Syndication Network

Credit and Debit Card Ratings